SEMI International Standards
Standards New Activity Report Form (SNARF)
Date Prepared: 09/18/2020Revised (if Applicable):

Document Number: 6731
SNARF for: Revision of SEMI PV69 - Test Method for Spectrum Response (SR) Measurement of Organic Photovoltaic (OPV) and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC) With Title Change To SEMI PV69 - Test Method for Spectrum Response (SR) Measurement of Organic Photovoltaic (OPV) and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC)and Perovskite Solar Cell(PSC)

Originating Global Technical Committee: Photovoltaic
Originating TC Chapter: Taiwan
Task Force (TF) in which work is to be carried out: Organic and Dye Sensitized Solar Cell and Perovskite solar cell Task Force
Note: If a new task force is needed, also submit a task force organization form (TFOF)

___________________________________________________________________________
1. Rationale:
a. Describe the need or problem addressed by this activity.
(Indicate the customer, what benefits they will receive, and if possible, quantify the impact on the return on investment [ROI] if the Document is implemented.)
The advantages of dye-sensitized solar cells are low manufacturing cost, low pollution, thin, light and flexible, etc. The innovative application of DSSC devices shall change people's lifestyle such as to integrate with indoor charging for 3C consumer and mobile devices anywhere. Currently Standard Test Condition (STC, AM1.5G, 25 deg C, 1000 W/m2 ) is designed for traditional solar products (Si & TF),which is not suitable for DSSC product that only work for visible light spectrum (300 ~ 800 nm). Therefore, the extra mass data modification is required for OPV/DSSC/PSC test. Comparing traditional solar products, OPV/DSSC/PSC product is more sensitive with temperature due to non-linear characteristics, so uniform temperature control platform is necessary. Therefore, this activity shall develop a new performance test method to evaluate OPV/DSSC/PSC device’s spectrum response (SR). This activity shall also provide a OPV/DSSC/PSC guide line relative to R&D of material, QC of cell/module manufacturing process, and device/end-product qualification. The current SEMI PV69 measures the SR method for DSSC/OPV. PSC has the same capacitance effect 2 Feb 2020 as DSSC/OPV. In order to make the original method more clearly applicable to PSC. This activity shall modify and add the title and text to the PSC wording, and it has been clearly stated that this method is suitable for DSSC/OPV/PSC.


b. Estimate effect on industry.
2: Major effect on an industry sector - identify the relevant sector
Sector or Company Information:

c. Estimate technical difficulty of the activity.
II: Some Difficulty - Disagreements on known requirements exist but developing consensus is possible

___________________________________________________________________________
2. Scope:
a: Describe the technical areas to be covered or addressed by this Document development activity. For Subordinate Standards, list common concepts or criteria that the Subordinate Standard inherits from the Primary Standard, as well as differences from the Primary Standard:
This activity shall develop a new performance test method to evaluate OPV/DSSC/PSC device’s spectrum response (SR). This activity shall also provide a OPV/DSSC/PSC guide line related to R&D of material, QC of cell/module manufacturing process, and device/end-product qualification. This new standard shall specify OPV/DSSC/PSC spectrum response (SR) test evaluation include items written as below: (1) Provide a guide line to correct OPV/DSSC/PSC data measured under STC. (2) Provide suitable statistic method to solve low response time issue for OPV/DSSC/PSC. (3) Provide a new isothermal platform standard for OPV/DSSC/PSC.

b: Expected result of activity
Major revision to an existing Standard or Safety Guideline

For a new Subordinate Standard, identify the Primary Standard here:




For Standards, identify the Standard Subtype below:
Test Method

Miscellaneous (describe below):

___________________________________________________________________________
3. Projected Timetable for Completion:

a: General Milestones
a. Activity Start: 09/18/2020b. 1st Draft by: 12/01/2020
c. (Optional) Informational Ballot by: 12/10/2020d. Letter Ballot by: 12/01/2020
e. TC Chapter Approval By:12/25/2020

_____________________________________________________________________________
4. Liaisons with other Global Technical Committees/TC Chapters/Subcommittees/TFs:
a. List SEMI global technical committees, TC Chapters, subcommittees, or task forces in your or other Regions/Locales that should be kept informed regarding the progress of this activity. (Refer to SEMI Standards organization charts and global technical committee charters and scopes as needed.)


b. List any planned Type I Liaisons with external nonprofit organizations (e.g., SDO) that should receive Draft Documents from Standards staff for feedback during this activity and be notified when the Letter Ballot is issued (refer to Procedure Manual § 7):


c. Intercommittee Ballots:
will not be issued

Identify the recipient global technical committee(s):

___________________________________________________________________________
5. Safety Considerations:
The resulting document is expected:
NOT to be a Safety Guideline

NOTE FOR "to be a Safety Guideline": When all safety-related information is removed from the Document, the Document is NOT technically sound and complete - Refer to Section 15.1 of the Regulations for special procedures to be followed.

NOTE FOR "NOT to be a Safety Guideline": When all safety-related information is removed from the Document, the Document is still technically sound and complete.

___________________________________________________________________________
6. Intellectual Property Considerations:
Note: Both a: and b: below should be checked for Revision of existing Standard(s) and Safety Guideline(s).

a. For a new Standard or Safety Guideline and for any part to be modified or added in a Revision of published Standards and Safety Guidelines:
the use of patented technology is NOT required.

If "patented technology is intended to be included in the proposed Standard(s) or Safety Guideline(s) " is selected above, then also check one:


b. For Revision, Reapproval, Reinstatement, or Withdrawal of existing Standard(s) and Safety Guideline(s):
there is no known material patented technology necessary to use or implement the Standard(s) and Safety Guideline(s)

c. The body of the Document and any Appendices, Complementary Files, Related Information sections, or Various Materials that may or may not be a part of the Document by reference:
the incorporation of Copyrighted Item will NOT be required



NOTE FOR ‘the use of patented technology or the incorporation of Copyrighted Item(s) is NOT required’: If in the course of developing the Document, it is determined that the use of patented technology or Copyrighted Item(s) is necessary for the Document, the provisions of Regulations § 16 must be followed.

NOTE FOR ’will incorporate Copyrighted Item’: A copyright release letter must be obtained from the copyright owner prior to publication.

___________________________________________________________________________
7. Comments, Special Circumstances:
None.

__________________________________________________________________________
8. TC Member Review:
took place between (put dates below ) before approval at the TC Chapter Meeting, or

Member Review Start Date; 12/10/2020
Member Review End Date: 12/24/2020

NOTE FOR ‘TC Member Review’ is required by the Regulations for a period of at least two weeks
before approval of a new, or a major revision of an existing, Standard or Safety Guideline. (Refer to Regulations ¶ 8.2.1)
__________________________________________________________________________

9. SNARF Approval Dates:
TC Chapter or GCS12/25/2020
Recorded in TC Minutes12/25/2020

__________________________________________________________________________

10. SNARF Extension Dates:
TC Chapter Extension Granted on
Extension Expires on
SNARF PV69.pdfSNARF PV69.pdf